home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
Illusion - Is Seeing Really Believing?
/
Illusion - Is Seeing Really Believing (1998)(Marshall Media)[Mac-PC].iso
/
pc
/
illusion
/
rock_fie.cxt
/
00106_Field_106.txt
< prev
next >
Wrap
Text File
|
1996-12-31
|
2KB
|
59 lines
Another interpretation of
constancy is similar to the
simple stimulus theory--
namely, that ratios and other
stimulus relations govern
perception. However, they are
believed to do so because
interactions in the brain are
the neural processes that
determine perception. Here we
see an example of the thinking
of the Gestalt psychologists. In
other words, both approaches
would regard ratios,
proportions, and other stimulus
relations as the basis of
constancy. But whereas the
stimulus theory has it that
these are the higher-order
stimulus correlates of
perception, the Gestalt theory
has it that such stimulus
relations yield constancy
percepts because of the neural
interaction to which they give
rise.
Another approach, stemming
from the thinking of
HelmholtzΓÇÖs contemporary
Ewald Hering, also emphasizes
the role of neural interactions.
It is a fact of the visual nervous
system that the discharging of
impulses in one neuron
inhibits the discharging of
impulses in adjacent neurons.
This lateral inhibition, as it is
called, might be thought to
explain contrast, the
inhibition causing one region
to look darker when an
adjacent region is "bright."
Lateral inhibition has also
been invoked to explain
lightness constancy, although
the explanation is more
complicated. The reduction of
the ratio principle to a
physiological mechanism has
given it great appeal to many
investigators. Despite the
underlying difference in the
view of the mind in these
approaches, they share the
belief that constancy is based
on such stimulus relations as
ratios.